This is a somewhat belated response to John Whiting's summary of my talk to The Guild of Food Writers. There is much of what he wrote that I disagree with. I don't think blogs are about "feeling the width", quantity over quality or a mere passing phase of popular mania. I fail to understand John's point that blogs are harder to search than other websites. As site is limited by its navigability.
John also tries to draw a distinction between 'ordinary' websites and blogs, a distinction that I think is irrelevant. There is very little difference as far as the average reader is concerned between the two. I am willing to bet that if someone googled Paris bistros (John's speciality) and came across Whitings Writings and then did a similar search for kosher food in London and came across Silverbrow on Food, they wouldn't appreciate the difference between the two sites. I also question whether they would care whether there is a difference between the two. What people want is good information or comment that is well written. I know that's what John provides and I hope I get somewhere close as well.
However, I do agree that for essays blogs are not the best medium. But I would extend the argument, I think the internet is not the best medium for lengthy Elizabeth David style essays. But more to the point, the beauty of the likes of David is her rarity, very few people write like her or have her knowledge or food. It doesn't matter what the medium is, few people can reach her heights. Whether I wrote on a more traditional website or some GFW members wrote on a blog, the quality of the writing simply is not comparable.
But, we should remember that John wrote his article primarily for the members of the GFW and it needs to be read in that context. This is something that John makes clear in the comments to his post. The GFW is for people who write about food professionally and those attending my talk were clearly interested in what the internet can do for them. He may well have a point that blogs are not the best way for a writer to promote themselves. Writing a blog is very different to writing for a newspaper or magazine, the obvious differences are the style and timeliness required for a blog. But they do have their advantages. Blogs require regular updating and therefore require the author to write frequently - never a bad thing. Posts also tend to be relatively brief, thus giving a reader (or potential editor) an idea of the blogger's skills of self-editing and brevity. Given that, I suppose I better stop now.