« Yes, the rumours are true | Main | Gordy, shh! »

04 July 2008

Pringles are not crisps, shocker

A UK court has ruled that Pringles aren't crisps.  Frederic Baur must be turning in his can.

Comments

If for any reason I edit a comment, I explicitly say so. I only edit comments if they are rude, abusive etc. I reserve the right to delete comments if I think they're unduly offensive or constitute spam.

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

What does that make Pringles though? I'd not be surprised if they weren't classified as food of any description actually, but I'm guessing they must be something.

Some sort of corn starch I think. Same as Burger King chips - they don't have any potato in them either.

Isn't that like the McDonald's milkshakes tht used not include milk?

I loved this post.

Actually Pringles DO contain potato - about 40% - it's just that they also contain wheat and corn flours! They are apparently more correctly classfied as a savoury cracker... Either way, they're evil ;-)

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment